Patrick Brazeau's Choice (Made)

Brazeau chooses Senate, but still has questions to answer

Despite his stated plan to do otherwise, Patrick Brazeau's recent appointment to the Senate confronted him with a choice:

He could be a Senator or the National Chief of the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples. Obvious potential conflict of interest prevented him from doing both.

Today, Brazeau finally announced a decision.

"My goal is and has always been to serve Canada's aboriginal peoples and my country to the best of my skills and abilities, in a manner that is accountable, responsible and transparent," Brazeau announced. "I am committed to bringing this same discipline to my role as a senator in the Parliament of Canada."

Yet some may wonder precisely how disciplined Brazeau has been as the National Chief of the CAP. On Thursday, the CAP suspended Walker Menard, its Manitoba director. Menard had commented negatively on the internal inquiries that had cleared Brazeau and one other senior employee of the CAP of sexual harrassment allegations.

Menard had also questioned Brazeau's qualifications to sit in the Senate.

The CAP insists that Menard's suspension has more to do with misrepresentation of membership numbers by the Manitoba branch of the CAP.

That the two complainants in the sexual harrassment allegations would be unsatisfied with the results of the inquiry is far less than surprising. However, Menard's comments cast even further doubt on the inquiry process. Clearly, further investigation is called for.

There are few ways to look at Menard's suspension other than as suspicious.

This kind of suspicion is unbecoming of a Canadian Senator. Considering the numerous black eyes that institution has suffered over the past few decades, it cannot stand another.

Brazeau and the CAP need to submit to a full investigation into not only the allegations that have been raised, but also into Menard's suspension.

Canadians have the right to expect transparency and accountability from both houses of government. If Brazeau won't deliver these things as National Chief of the CAP Canadians have every reason to be concerned about whether or not he'll deliver them as a Senator.

Patrick Brazeau's Choice

Amidst the innuendo, the Globe and Mail raises a point

As Patrick Brazeau prepares to formally take his seat in the Canadian Senate, a scandal is emerging that may cast a shadow over the entire affair.

Jade Harper, a former employee of the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples, has filed a grievance against Brazeau alleging that he allowed drinking and sexual exploitation to take place in the offices of the CAP.

"There was a lot of drinking at the office," Harper said. "Once I put my grievance in, I would get the dirty looks in the office. No one would talk to me. Patrick wouldn't ...They just totally shut the door on me completely."

Harper alleges that she was sexually exploited by a senior CAP employee. She had a "personal relationship" with that individual.

As if Harper's allegations weren't bad enough, Brazeau himself is facing a sexual harrassment complaint that dates to the same time as Harper's complaint.

The original complaint is currently before Canada's currently-embattled Human Rights Commission. The executive board of the CAP had investigated the allegations and acquitted Brazeau last year.

"It's basically case-closed," Brazeau insisted.

However, Walter Menard, the CAP executive board member from Manitoba, insists that the investigation was not transparent. Indeed, the Harper case represents the second time that the CAP had such allegations made against during that period of time, and the second occasion on which the CAP simply investigated itself.

Of course, such issues tend to be extremely contentious, and are rarely resolved to the satisfaction of the complainants unless the accused is found guilty. That the matter would find itself before the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal as opposed to a court of law is also fairly troubling, considering the extremely dubious activities of some of Canada's Human Rights Commissions.

Considering the timeframe of the two complaints, there is no question that they should be investigated by an outside agency. However, the CHRC is absolutely not the place for such an investigation.

More interestingly, however, Brazeau wants to wants to remain the chief of the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples even as he sits in the Senate.

As a spokesman for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation noted, that is definitely a serious no-no.

"At the end of the day, if the money's coming from taxpayers, it's double dipping of a kind," the spokesperson announced, referring to the $100,170 Brazeau recieves as the CAP Chief and the $130,400 salary he would recieve as a Senator. The CTF spokesperson also rightly raised the very real probability -- not mere possibility -- of a conflict of interest. "To actually be a member of the government that he's advocating to would strike me as inherently conflictual."

There's very little question that it would. As the Chief of the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples Brazeau's first responsibility is to Canada's off-reserve aboriginal population. But as a Senator, his first responsibility is to the people of Canada as a whole.

While most Canadians like to believe that almost any issue that arises between Canada's aboriginals and the country as a whole can be worked out to the mutual satisfaction of each party, history has far too often taught us differently.

While Brazeau's voice within Parliament and within the government in particular is valuable to aboriginal Canadians, the truth of the matter is that he cannot reasonably be expected to live up to the obligations of each role. Especially when one considers the near inevitability of conflict between the two.

Brazeau needs to decide how he can best serve his country and his people. Then he needs to make his choice.

He cannot be both a Senator and the Chief of the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples.