King of duck-and-run debate strikes again
Apparently, in the midst of a recent complaint by Canadian Cynic that Raphael Alexander allegedly accused him of wishing harm on Wanda Watkins, intellectual coward extraordinaire forgot one little thing before he raised the alarm of protest.
After all, it isn't as if he hasn't wished harm on people before.
As a matter of fact, he has.
According to Cynic, this was neither OK nor was "not OK". But he argues it isn't relevant.
He objects to being accused of wishing harm on another person (and writing a post like this it's pretty safe to assume that he wished emotional harm on Watkins), yet his response to pointing out that he has, in fact, explicitly wished harm on other people some how isn't relevant.
But he won't explain why. And just don't ask him. We wouldn't want the idiot to have an aneurism.
...That's the difference between us and him.
Sunday, March 09, 2008
2 comments:
Post your comments, and join the discussion!
Be aware that spam posts and purile nonsense will not be tolerated, although purility within constructive commentary is encouraged.
All comments made by Kevron are deleted without being read. Also, if you begin your comment by saying "I know you'll just delete this", it will be deleted. Guaranteed. So don't be a dumbass.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
He certainly is a phenomenally dishonest chap. His style is so assumptive and egotistical, and yet cannot admit the majority of times when he is so very wrong.
ReplyDeleteOh, but, Raphael! Didn't you know?
ReplyDeleteConservatives are evil! Every last one of us! Anything this guy could do to us is perfectly laudable because we're so vicious and hateful and...
...
...Waitaminit. That sounds an awful lot like Cynic...