King of duck-and-run debate strikes again
Apparently, in the midst of a recent complaint by Canadian Cynic that Raphael Alexander allegedly accused him of wishing harm on Wanda Watkins, intellectual coward extraordinaire forgot one little thing before he raised the alarm of protest.
After all, it isn't as if he hasn't wished harm on people before.
As a matter of fact, he has.
According to Cynic, this was neither OK nor was "not OK". But he argues it isn't relevant.
He objects to being accused of wishing harm on another person (and writing a post like this it's pretty safe to assume that he wished emotional harm on Watkins), yet his response to pointing out that he has, in fact, explicitly wished harm on other people some how isn't relevant.
But he won't explain why. And just don't ask him. We wouldn't want the idiot to have an aneurism.
...That's the difference between us and him.