tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post5881951027880202387..comments2023-10-10T10:34:10.843-06:00Comments on The Nexus of Assholery: No Tears For This Guy, EitherPatrick Rosshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-69561913980720167702011-04-04T11:31:58.505-06:002011-04-04T11:31:58.505-06:00The police didn't "clearly" do any s...The police didn't "clearly" do any such thing.<br /><br />He went looking for trouble, and he found it.<br /><br />What I <i>really</i> want to know is what's in the full, unedited security camera footage. What <i>really</i> happened at the 2:00:08 time mark?Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-44365551926207478962011-04-04T09:36:20.407-06:002011-04-04T09:36:20.407-06:00Before you try and defame Derek, you need to get y...Before you try and defame Derek, you need to get your facts straight, out of the multiple times that Derek recounted the story of the first police officer assaulting him, he only used the word "hit" once, the other times he distinctly says he was "pushed" which he probably said 5 times, to the 1 time he said hit. He never says that he was punched. So I don't think Derek is trying to demonize the Police with no cause to do so. The Police clearly violated his rights as a Canadian.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07680430992823958530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-28909734975289477512010-10-27T01:55:49.115-06:002010-10-27T01:55:49.115-06:00I would certainly like to know why Soberal edited ...I would certainly like to know why Soberal edited the security camera footage.<br /><br />You can see his reaction to such a question here. Perhaps one of you would like to ask him the same?Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-59299347781401814952010-10-25T08:20:19.583-06:002010-10-25T08:20:19.583-06:00In order to shed tears for Derek Soberal, one woul...<b>In order to shed tears for Derek Soberal, one would have to assume -- simply assume -- that he's telling the truth, even despite him changing his story.</b><br /><br />Sadly, the problem is that with people like Derek, they WANT you to assume that the police are always bad and the citizen is always good. Personally, I was taught the reverse of this - that the police will generally act "good" unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. Naive I know, but less so than assuming the police are always going to do bad things.oxygentaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02062383921172093288noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-52544004000372821632010-10-17T11:16:20.218-06:002010-10-17T11:16:20.218-06:00This guy very clearly took every pain to draw as m...This guy very clearly took every pain to draw as much attention to himself as he could get. And it's very typical of folks like Soberal.<br /><br />It seems that Soberal himself is the owner of the SecretStore YouTube page, which also features 9/11 "truth" propaganda.<br /><br />One of the obnoxious themes in the 9/11 "truth" movement is that they demand attention from anyone and everyone. They'll show up to nearly any public event and engage in this precise kind of attention-seeking behaviour.<br /><br />Derek Soberal sought the attention of the police, and he got it. He's also very clearly hiding evidence about what really took place at the 2:00:08 timemark of the security camera footage taken on 9/16/2010.<br /><br />Simply put: what is Derek Soberal hiding?Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-8188457019015539292010-10-17T05:10:02.993-06:002010-10-17T05:10:02.993-06:00Rodney King was brutalized captured on video, this...Rodney King was brutalized captured on video, this person has not provided any evidence of any wrongdoing.<br /><br />He ignores "filming, taking pictures" of the security perimeter may be viewed by the security as a valid issue to be investigated by peace officers.<br /><br />He confirms in his video those other people "walking by" were not being stopped or asked to provide identification. <br /><br />If the peace officers stopped EVERYONE than it would be an ISSUE. They simply asked him to provide identification and context why he was "filming the security fence" that he admits to doing.<br /><br /><br />His residence? How does the peace officer determine that without viewing identification? <br /><br />How long was the "Hi, I see you, you see me stunt?" we don't know.<br />We don't know if the person interrupted his break, drew unwanted attention to the peace officer, affected completion of paperwork before ending his shift. Was the officer was parked across the street to monitor for illegal activity (drug, prostitution, stakeout for person living there?) <br /><br />(Undetermined amount of time from Hi look at me to questioning by the single officer asking for ID)<br /><br />He was asked why he was standing outside at 1:57 am outside his residence and the peace officer used his discretion in asking for identification to determine his residency?<br /><br />The editing and narrative reminds me of a typical Michael Moore video. Way too much extraneous information in personal opinion.<br /><br />He runs away from a single officer, alleging an assault and violation of his rights without any proof or expertise other than his opinion.<br /><br />He is shocked additional peace officers are called in to locate him after he runs away during questioning?<br /><br />I can see why officers would question him. It was inconsistent to run away after providing ID confirming your live here. The camera was the impartial witness and he abandoned it to play "catch me if you can".CanadianSensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01010880162544507668noreply@blogger.com