tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post3384249953064763904..comments2023-10-10T10:34:10.843-06:00Comments on The Nexus of Assholery: Cry Harder, LindsayPatrick Rosshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-70181529068588678322007-11-15T11:29:00.000-07:002007-11-15T11:29:00.000-07:00"I drew a line in the sand. Lindsay Stewart crosse...<I>"I drew a line in the sand. Lindsay Stewart crossed it. Cynic crossed it (and he will be identified, at a time and place of my choosing)."</I><BR/><BR/>Not if I out him first!<BR/><BR/>:)Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08833076599650152590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-15805471330548317682007-11-15T10:47:00.000-07:002007-11-15T10:47:00.000-07:00Dave, Dave, Dave,You just aren't getting the point...Dave, Dave, Dave,<BR/><BR/>You just aren't getting the point, are you? I don't particularly care what you think.<BR/><BR/>Not only are you <I>callow</I> enough to defend that cowardly piece of slime, but, quite frankly, you're no less a piece of trash than he is.<BR/><BR/>The fact that you would <I>defend</I> his attack on Wanda Watkins as "just rage" is merely further proof of that.<BR/><BR/>There were plenty of ways Cynic could have <I>disagreed</I> with Wanda Watkins (which would have been perfectly legitimate) without having to resort to an attack as he did. But, instead, he attacked her.<BR/><BR/>Shorter Canadian Cynic: "Fuck you and your grief because I disagree with you politically."<BR/><BR/>Shorter Sparky: "Yeah, Cynic, you sure told <I>her</I>!"<BR/><BR/>Sparky, you can go ahead and say whatever you want about <I>me</I>. I don't need to impress you. But at least I can safely say that <I>I'm</I> not a sycophantic hypocrite. I mean, you could say the same, it just wouldn't be true.<BR/><BR/>As you may recall, I drew a line in the sand over the Wanda Watkins affair. That line is rather simple: if you want to attack a grieving mother, you'd better have enough courage to do it using your own name. Cynic doesn't. <BR/><BR/>The funniest thing about it is that instead of doing the right thing and <I>apologizing</I> (making a weak excuse about his cat being run over doesn't cut it), he's actually conducted himself as if he's quite proud of it.<BR/><BR/>And the rest of you little weasles seem fine with that. It makes you just as bad.<BR/><BR/>Canadian Cynic attacked Wanda Watkins, and hid behind anonymity.<BR/><BR/>I drew a line in the sand. Lindsay Stewart crossed it. Cynic crossed it (and he <I>will</I> be identified, at a time and place of my choosing).<BR/><BR/>At the end of the day, the hilatrious thing is this: time spent determining PSA's identity: zero. The hypocritical outrage of Canadian Cynic's groupies? Priceless.Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-55570743432881270522007-11-15T10:00:00.000-07:002007-11-15T10:00:00.000-07:00"but.. but.. but Canadian Cynic was a meanie!!!"Wa..."but.. but.. but Canadian Cynic was a meanie!!!"<BR/>Want to dig that immature hole any deeper?<BR/>And we can add a reading comprehension of zero 'cause CC wasn't telling a grieving mother to fuck off, he was telling a grieving mother to stop using her grief to guilt the rest of us into supporting and continuing the war. Just outrage is something you don't get.<BR/>And Just outrage is what you're facing now when you 'outed' PSA for no good reason.<BR/>I also like how you moved the goal posts again--another sign of a callow intellect who can't address the issue but come up with yet one more obfuscation to avoid dealing with the very problem you started.<BR/>First it was 'I won't deal with my deliberately causing consternation in others because you're anon, Sparky!'<BR/>So I give my name (and your super sleuthing sKilLz0rs should be able to track me down faster than you did with PSA 'cause I'm pretty easy to find on the internets) but that wasn't good enuf--now it's 'I won't answer you 'cause CC's a meanie (as long as I deliberately misread what CC actually wrote)!!'<BR/>And what's with the 'you people'? Generalizing?? Another sign of a very immature outlook.<BR/>It's amazing what we can hide behind when we generalize--"I don't have to answer my misdeeds 'cause 'you people' are worse!!"<BR/>Once again, wanna get off that high horse and grow up, jackass?Sparkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07537839430366306648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-45007380966361325942007-11-14T15:09:00.000-07:002007-11-14T15:09:00.000-07:00Really, Sparky.Now, what lessons would you suggest...Really, Sparky.<BR/><BR/>Now, what lessons would you suggest that <I>reality</I> is teaching me? That a bunch of self-professed left-wingers want to try and condemn me for something?<BR/><BR/>Let me ask you this: where was that outrage (on behalf of yourself <I>and</I> Lindsay Stewart) when Cynic attacked Wanda Watkins? Where was it?<BR/><BR/>Watkins' greatest crime, in Cynic's words, was supporting the war in Afghanistan, and having a dead son.<BR/><BR/>And Cynic attacked her for that.<BR/><BR/>Where was the outrage, Sparky? Where was it?<BR/><BR/>You people want me to believe that <I>I've</I> done something wrong in outing one of Cynic's hatchetpeople, in comparison to <I>that</I>?<BR/><BR/>You people are simply hilarious.<BR/><BR/>What is even <I>more</I> hilarious is this: apparently, I've earned the scorn of people who, largely, I have no respect for -- in fact, little but contempt for -- and you think I'm supposed to care.<BR/><BR/>That just makes me laugh.Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-62473688439970044432007-11-14T12:25:00.000-07:002007-11-14T12:25:00.000-07:00I'm not giving lessons. I'm stating what is.You w...I'm not giving lessons. I'm stating what is.<BR/>You won't take lessons from reality, either, but that's your way.<BR/>You to the person and not at what the person stated--"right, I'm totally going to take lessons about how to be grown-up from Sparky"<BR/>That by itself again shows a lack of maturity.<BR/>Nicknames set you off? Hi, my name's Dave. Now will you deal with your jackassedness that you showed when you 'outed' PSA? What did you accomplish? What are you accomplishing with repeatedly mentioning her real name and/or initials in your blog posts "I know your real name!! Neener neener neener!!!"<BR/>If that's not callow, then what is?Sparkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07537839430366306648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-71165014631676414732007-11-13T20:06:00.000-07:002007-11-13T20:06:00.000-07:00Right. I'm totally going to take lessons about how...Right. I'm <I>totally</I> going to take lessons about how to be a grown-up from <I>Sparky</I>.<BR/><BR/>Just keep holding your breath, bud.Patrick Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04592482865332628189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9149446.post-43961979567505675762007-11-13T09:31:00.000-07:002007-11-13T09:31:00.000-07:00How about they attack you for what you did (which ...How about they attack you for what you did (which is, from what I read, exactly what they did)<BR/>You had no good reason to publish her name. None whatsoever.<BR/>Yet you did.<BR/>And then you added the snide 'failed actor' bit to... what? Add some salt? Rubbing it in just a tad bit more??<BR/>And this doesn't make you the posterboy for 'internet jackass of the year'?<BR/>Grow up. You're a petulant brat who talks (or writes) before you think. <BR/>What's that word I'm looking for?<BR/>Oh right... callow.Sparkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07537839430366306648noreply@blogger.com